The awareness-versus-operability gap
The widest contrast in the data is internal to the profile: staff understand the model's purpose far better than they can yet operate its tools. That gap is the quantitative shape of the whole finding.
Nisk Readiness Profile · Wave 1
Loading the central finding...
Each pillar is the equal-weighted mean of its items on a 1-to-4 scale. The dashed line is the 2.5 conceptual midpoint. In the non-deficit frame, a bar below the line marks where the system has not yet built the conditions for readiness, not where staff fell short.
The widest contrast in the data is internal to the profile: staff understand the model's purpose far better than they can yet operate its tools. That gap is the quantitative shape of the whole finding.
The five highest and five lowest items across all six pillars. Switch the toolbar to "Items" to explore every item inside the pillar charts.
A separate six-item block scored so that a higher value means greater perceived risk. It is never folded into a pillar score. Turnover and unfilled positions is the single highest-rated risk in the instrument.
Overall readiness index by group. Small cells are suppressed in the data so no view can expose an individual; suppressed and small-n groups are labelled and not charted as a result. These are signals; small groups are not interpretable on their own.
Select a pillar to see its items and negative shares beside an anonymized quote from the matching qualitative theme. This is where the numbers and the comments finally sit together.
Plain-language interpretation built in, so a viewer understands what they are seeing rather than being left to infer it.